Camera Control Pro 2 (& D90) “No camera was detected” | Nikon D90 | Flickr – DF5 Version History

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Consultancy auxilione. Water levels. Energy bill. President joe biden. House prices. Siemens ag. Siemens energy. Roland busch. Andrew gross. Oil prices. Gas price. Strictly come dancing. Tony adams. Jayde adams. Kaye adams. Ellie taylor. West texas intermediate. Global market.

International energy agency. Economic slowdown. Met office. Water supplies. England and wales. Extreme heat. Breedon group. Revenue growth. Ellie simmonds. Richie anderson. Matt goss. Will mellor. Craig revel horwood. Kym marsh. Shirley ballas. Motsi mabuse. Anton du beke. European shares. Kendrick lamar. Justin timberlake. Britney spears. Nile rogers.

Dragon ball super. Super hero. Dragon ball z. Dragon ball. Red ribbon army. Kettering city schools. Fairmont high school. Richard d wolff. It’s been so long I don’t remember the details, but it’s far more intrusive than Adobe’s license management stuff. Especially in the context of open source software suggesting DxO anything is in poor taste unless they’ve ditched Pace.

CharlesW 39 days ago root parent prev next [—]. I use the spacebar a lot for that ;. One contains your custom configurations like presets, the other contains info about file locations, ratings, film rolls, etc. Deleting and reimport takes time when a lot of files are involved, but is my preferred way of handling the changes of large scale file operations. But film rolls might not be the best way to manage files. After six years, I found searching the database using tags and Exif data such as camera and date ranges with the collection tool works better for me.

What also helps me is never deleting or moving an image file. That way the database stays current and I avoid the busy work of file and folder manager. To put it another way, for me flat search is better than hierarchy navigation. Imports without copy works well enough for me. Derbasti 38 days ago parent prev next [—].

There are also shortcuts for the arrow panels. Let’s see if this changed anything. The color science is missed up in Darktable and in Raw therappe, I just couldn’t get something decent out. I would be editing for an hour and end up with a weird looking image, while in lightroom I would be done in 10 minutes. People might say that I’m just used to lightroom but I’m not, I was using Capture one, then didn’t shoot anything for multiple years, then just went pack to Lightroom and could edit photos without major frustrations and get decent results quickly.

Creative apps in general are a very weak point of the Linux desktop, and when they exist, that have many weird requests and problems that just using them on windows is easier Davinci resolve requiring the crappy closed source AMD drivers. Youden 39 days ago parent next [—]. I shoot Sony and use Darktable exclusively. I think your problem might be the base curve module and its default “Sony” preset, which looks like garbage. Try setting it to “neutral”, it should look a lot better presets are under the little arrow next to the “base curve” header.

The base curve presets, if I understand correctly, aim to make the photo look similar to the out of camera JPEGs. In my opinion, they look like garbage. But these days I use Filmic for everything. My process is basically switch off base curve, switch on Filmic, adjust exposure so that mid exposure looks reasonable, adjust white and black exposure in Filmic to taste and done.

The important thing to me is that this works for every photo, not just the easy ones. ETTR photos of high dynamic range scenes work just the same. Makes the shadows noise-free no matter how hard you push them. The open source options in particular could do with some UI love Out of curiosity what stops you from using dxo for everything? What do you mean by Filmic? Their website filmicpro. Likely the “filmic rgb” module in darktable.

One of the most popular modules, it’s pretty easy to get good results with the workflow they described. I also use it on most of my RAW pictures. Youden 39 days ago root parent prev next [—]. If you want help you need to explain what you did or tried. Did you work in display referred or scene referred? I can recommend submitting one of your raw files to a Play Raw[0].

People will edit your raw file and send back an. In my opinion, the Lightroom edit in the OP is the best. Many of the replies with Darktable edits look extremely bad. Some have extreme color artifacts. Highlight reconstruction was a major and well-known shortcoming in versions they were using.

Better highlight reconstruction for large blown-out areas was finally added in darktable 4. First time I’m hearing this. I think Sony owners make up a sizable portion of the user base. I never had an issue with the RAWs from an a and another entry level Sony mirrorless.

Though I never used anything other than dt, so maybe I don’t know what I’m missing. I’ve had a similar experience, especially with skin tones. The out of camera jpegs can be a little aggressive in making skin and grass colors “pop”, but they still beat Darktable even with significant tinkering.

About once a year I try DT but always bounce off of it pretty hard for one very simple reason: my Canon raw images in DT don’t look anything like what they do in-camera. I did a studio shoot on Monday: clean strobe light, a tame white background, all settings manual so no auto-lighting-optimizer , and fired up my raws in 4. Then I double clicked to bring it into Darkroom and it goes crazy: the backdrop goes a crazy purple hue, the exposure is wrong by about a third of a stop, and the skin is zombified.

It’s utterly incomprehensible to me. Every year I check and every year I’m baffled at how dreadful it is. Cya next year I guess. I understand why this turns you off, but I wanted to note that what you want: some default magic settings that make the photo look like Canon’s in camera processing, is an explicit non-goal for the DT devs.

Don’t get your hopes up. What you are looking at when entering the darkroom is an “undeveloped” raw. I still use DT because it is very powerful, but I do agree that it has a very steep learning curve, and therefore is frustrating for anyone who isnt fully committed to learning about digital color science, etc, myself included.

Someone 39 days ago root parent next [—]. This has nothing to do with the “camera maker’s JPEG engine. Both Lightroom and Photo Lab do exactly this.

If Darktable cannot support reading that information and importing it as a preset, that’s fine, but pretending it is an artist choice seems to misunderstand what is going on here. To get specific Picture Control settings e. You are right, but I’m very sorry to say that attempting to faithfully recreate the look of the manufacturers JPEGs will likely never be the goal of darktable or any serious photographer for that matter.

What happens when you buy a camera from a different brand? You will likely want to normalize the output between your cameras and not to have every other picture rendered with Canon’s interpretation of the the scene and the rest with Nikon’s. It doesn’t have to be “faithful” and I agree it’s not most people’s “goal”, but here’s why I still want it and appreciate that Lightroom does it very well: – I’ve been shooting mirrorless, and consequently using EVFs, since the NEX 6 came out.

When I take a photo, I have already seen it. I have a vague idea of what tweaks I want to make, so having to start from scratch just interrupts that.

Of course, sometimes those tweaks will override basically every default setting, but that doesn’t mean having them wasn’t valuable – I often shoot RAW not because I want to painstakingly develop each photo to perfection, but because I simply need more latitude to “fix things in post”.

Especially when shooting events in suboptimal lighting or when I need to raise the ISO to make sure a critical event gets captured. FWIW I agree with you, but DT devs don’t, which is their right to put in their free time to develop their software according to their own preferences. Of course! I wasn’t trying to suggest otherwise. But these kinds of discussions are still important because if enough of us got together we could start a community initiative to develop this and either get it merged or maintain a live fork with these features.

Simply not true. Sorry, I don’t understand. It’s not a simple case of reading data from the raw though. Out of those you listed, yes, white balance can be trivially read from the metadata and applied to the processing automatically, and in fact DT does do exactly that.

DT does have this data and applies it automatically, but the calibration is provided by users and might not be ideal. You would probably get better results by doing your own calibration, but that is somewhat involved. Picture control things like saturation etc that you select in camera are post processing steps that the camera applies to the raw in order to get a “developed” jpeg. They are proprietary to the camera maker and not published. Even if you can read settings like “saturation” and “portrait mode” from the metadata, you don’t know which algorithm exactly that implies.

Lightroom and other commercial software works with camera makers under NDA in order to reproduce the camera’s processing. Could it be reverse engineered by open source software?

Maybe, but the DT devs decided that they prefer to go in another direction. Do you have any link explaining this reasoning? It does seem weird to me because not handling camera specific color management seem contradictory to a good experience. Raw files are actually not in any way “neutral” or standard, they are pretty specific to the camera and brand depending on how they calibrated their censor and other considerations such as potential treatments etc. Not handling that at the software level and leaving it to the user means that you would have to do a repetitive and complex work for every single picture when other softwares give you a “neutral” basis even though any attempt at neutrality is always limited.

True neutrality could not display the image with RBG at all This would seem like a weird choice as anyways you have to do a bunch of conversion, so not using camera profile just means the conversion is less faithful. Sorry for the misunderstanding, DT does handle the color space of the camera sensor, via the “Input Color Profile” module but this camera calibration data is not published by camera manufacturers. For Canon for example, DT has a single generic “Canon” color matrix profile, which was probably created by a user.

You would get better results by calibrating your specific camera. Commercial software makers are able to obtain camera profiles and other stuff like processing algorithms to match in-camera processing under NDA from camera makers. Sorry, not specific link, just stuff I picked up by following the pixls. The older I get the less time I want to be in front of a computer.

I would prefer my photography software to do the workflow I want it to do, not what someone else thinks I should do — regardless of whether it’s free or not. Besides, the more I’m behind a camera in nature, the better I usually feel. The more I’m behind a screen, the worse.

That’s quite OK. It’s just that DT then is not the right software for you, since the dev team has an opposing viewpoint to yours. Rawtherapee I think has a feature that tries to apply curves in order to match the built in jpeg preview.

Otherwise you might be better served by commercial software such as Lightroom or Capture One, as they work with camera manufacturers in order to match the in-camera processing. And that’s what I do. I just find it too bad because it’s interface is really not bad, and it’s fairly capable at what it does. To me, I don’t care really, but in , photography is still an underserved segment in the open source software world. I feel like they can have their opinion, but then allow others to have a UI element to turn it on if they so choose.

There’s a lot of high quality gear floating around ebay for fairly cheap compared to when they were new.

Oh my goodness this sounds amazing. Darktable is amazing. It takes some getting used to after Lightroom — it doesn’t hold your hand as much — but once you get past that, the tools surpass LR in the power they give the user. Parametric masks, LAB curves, wavelet decomposition are very powerful ways to work with the raw stuff of images. On several ocassions I’ve tried switching to Darktable or RawTherapee, but they never seemed to offer the practicality and ease of workflow that Lightroom has.

They have tons of features and kudos for that, but when it comes to editing hundreds of photos, LR is the only choice for me. To manage tousands pictures, LRC wins. DT and RT are full of features that are mostly pointless for professional use. It has that linux philosophy – from nerds to nerds. But not for practical use unfortunatelly. No Fuji profiles, not many lens correction profiles, wired demosaic for X-Trans, not consistent UI, no native folder sync, no AI clone tool Kab1r 39 days ago prev next [—].

Darktable replaced Lightroom in my workflow and I haven’t looked back since. It is definitely one of my favorite pieces of open source software.

I don’t know how it’s written but it would be awesome to have a browser version without the remote desktop rdp stuff; I might take a look to see how hard it would be to implement when I have the time. How do you do file managment. The thought of going back to doing it manually fills me with dread. My other issue is that I have filters custom applied adjustments that I an loathed give us and can’t be bothered trying to replicate. And what I almost forgot, lense correction and rotating towards drawable vertical or horizontal lines are great features.

Keep in mind that darktable really insists on doing things from the ground up, and pretty much requires you to understand the underlying pipeline and what you want to achieve. If you are just experimenting with random sliders, you aren’t likely to get good results. It mostly sticks to standard industrial and scientific definitions instead of marketable names, and contains very little “magic” that is common to commercial photography software such as saturation intentionally not being actual saturation, hidden curves, and so on.

Rant of darktable. Primarily technical stuff. Jedd 39 days ago parent prev next [—]. I occasionally try to come back to DarkTable, RawTherapee etc, but similarly for my requirements they feel like overkill, and require much more time than I have to properly understand the underlying theories. For a simpler interface that gets me a naive user half-way decent results pretty quickly, I’ll drop back to LightZone.

Whole bunch of ready-made presets that combine primitives sharpness, contrast, saturation, curves etc , and easy to save new presets once you find a combination you like.

Gonna check it out, thanks for the tip. Lightroom user here. It’s over hyped. Yeah, it’s cool and all but anything else would do the same thing.

The only thing that I actually found is better in Lightroom is the AI detection features. Same can go with Photoshop and paint. You can’t change the aperture after the image has been captured. I don’t think you’re the intended audience for darktable. What I meant was exposure compensation, sorry. Filmulator might be worthwhile to try, I’ll check it out.

The checksums are:”. Maybe referring to the source tarball github generates for releases? Normille 39 days ago parent prev next [—]. The wording is a bit vague, but I presumed they meant to use the tar. No idea what the build system is, but for some you want users to download the prebootstrapped version. I take photos on my XF for fun, want to do little edits here and there and filmic rgb etc. I’d like to see far more work on the UX. I can imagine a scenario where you load it for the first time and you’re presented with a choice for beginner or advanced UI.

Beginner UI would drop you into a Lightroom-esque filtered set of modules, and take you through a tutorial of the UI.

The alien terms are actually familiar to videographers, colorists, and people who understand color theory in general. For some reason I don’t understand, video folks have always had much better tools for handling color, dynamic ranges etc, and also the much saner pipeline than photographers.

Aaargh 39 days ago root parent next [—]. You edit a photo to something that pleases you and that is it. With video, you have multiple pieces of footage recorded at different times, in different circumstances and locations that need to match in their look to make a video feel like a consistent whole.

Getting the color right is much more critical for video. Sure, but that doesn’t mean the UX is good. Lightroom and Capture One and heck, even Affinity Photo , make common photography tasks like highlight recovery easily accessed with a single slider. Sure, the Darktable UI may be “meaningful to colorists”, but that doesn’t necessarily result in a good UX for the main people that are likely to want to use it.

 
 

Nikon camera control pro 2 version 2.4.0 free

 

ВР начала неистово мигать, когда ядро захлестнул черный поток. Под потолком завыли сирены. – Информация уходит. – Вторжение по всем секторам.

 

Versions of Nikon Software | DSLRBodies | Thom Hogan

 
News /; Camera control Pro and Capture NX Two new software downloads are now available via the Nikon web site. 9 Dec PM by ePHOTOzine. ViewNX-i version ; Capture NX-D version ; Picture Control Utility version ; Camera Control Pro 2 version Added support for Z 7 firmware version and Z 6 firmware version Fixed an issue that resulted in the camera and the LCD display area.